Categories
Uncategorized

Reaching net zero targets with tech and carbon reporting

Matthew Jones, founder of Open ECX, explores why carbon reporting is key to driving a net zero future

The UK is committed to reaching its net zero goals by 2050, with some regions, such as Greater Manchester, aiming to achieve this as early as 2038. As one of the UK’s most energy-intensive sectors, many are looking to the construction industry to make necessary and the sector itself has acknowledged the need for action such as carbon reporting, if we are to achieve carbon neutrality.

Last year, the UN reported that carbon emissions from buildings operations had reached an all-time high, and that the construction sector was not on track to achieve decarbonisation by 2050. To meet the UK’s net zero aims, it’s vital for construction businesses to lower their carbon output, while finding a way to report on it.

As in many other sectors, it’s not enough for businesses to simply state they’ve reduced their carbon footprint – instead they’re being asked to report on it by other members of the supply chain, and as part of the process when they’re pitching for new projects.

The easiest and most effective way to do this is by choosing a comprehensive digital system that can report the carbon cost of each part of their work and collate data from each touchpoint within the supply chain. By adopting these new technologies, digital reporting is giving construction businesses the tools to report carbon effectively and accurately across all transactions in the purchase to pay (P2P) process, from order invoices to GRNs, as well as track their progress and identify opportunities for improvement.
Staying competitive

Last year, the UK Green Building Council (UKGBC) created the Net Zero Carbon Buildings Framework, giving construction organisations easy-to-follow guidance for improving overall sustainability across the sector. One key part of the framework was to improve measurement and transparency.

In accordance with the framework, construction firms must be prepared to measure their emissions using the most accurate data available, and be prepared to publicly disclose them, showing exactly how it was collected and the steps they have taken to consciously lower carbon emissions.

Not only is carbon reporting a key consideration as part of the Net Zero Carbon Buildings Framework, it has also become a non-negotiable for those looking to win public sector projects. Central government, executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies in England buying goods and services with annual contract values of £5m or more, must refer to the carbon reduction guidance set out in Procurement Policy Note 06/21 – in short, large public sector projects now require emissions reporting as a minimum standard.

Automated reporting

The carbon output of a supply chain can include everything from emissions during the manufacturing process of materials, to how they’re transported and disposed of after a project ends, and everything in between. Therefore, reporting all the carbon output across all parts of the supply chain is no mean feat.

Fortunately, new technology within the sector is simplifying the reporting process, allowing it to be almost entirely automated.

Many businesses have already adopted comprehensive digital systems which allow them to navigate the entire P2P journey. For them, the process will be familiar – the only addition being that, alongside being able to track the P2P process, carbon emissions per transaction are also shared.

This allows businesses to collate carbon emissions from all partners and easily generate reports and analytics from a wide range of sources, resulting in a comprehensive final report. In-depth information on total emissions, emissions per invoice or transaction and emissions by category (e.g., energy consumption, transportation) can be easily created and shared.

Furthermore, digitising the P2P process is a scalable solution, meaning that as businesses continue to expand, taking on larger projects and facing higher volumes of transactions, they can easily scale their sustainability efforts alongside their growth.

Digital systems have obvious benefits if you’re required to share reports on emissions to win contracts. But more than that, in the long term it also allows businesses to easily make comparisons between carbon reports to show progress over time.

By measuring and analysing emissions, businesses can uncover opportunities for reducing energy consumption, optimising resource use, and implement more sustainable practices.

This can lead to cost savings in the long run through reduced energy expenses.

Moving to paperless

Beyond being able to track and report on carbon footprint, another benefit of a digital system is eliminating the need for paper invoices. We all know that the production of paper contributes massively to energy consumption, deforestation and carbon emissions, therefore the process of digital invoicing in itself is a contributor to achieving net zero.

Promoting collaboration

Arguably one of the best but often overlooked benefits of digital invoicing is the enhanced communication amongst users from different areas within construction.

Companies that are able and willing to take this one step further and share their carbon emissions data, will help promote a culture of transparency across the entire construction industry. They will be leaders in sharing knowledge and insight to help meet our net zero targets, bringing other members of their supply chain on a similar journey.

What impact will digital systems have on the future of the construction industry?

If everyone made the effort to embrace digitisation, there’s no doubt that we would see great progress being made across the sector.

Having a digitally integrated approach to the P2P journey across the board improves coordination with suppliers and speed ups notoriously lengthy processes, ensuring payments are made on time so businesses can continue to thrive.

With digital systems facilitating the storage, retrieval and sharing of project documents, drawings, contracts and permits, paperless documentation becomes the norm.

Furthermore, by eliminating the need for physical document storage, the risk of information being lost or duplicated becomes almost negligible.

With the correct adoption of digital systems, routine administrative tasks can be moved to an automated process. Those roles, which usually involve time-consuming manual tasks, can be replaced by technology, freeing up time for to focus on value-added tasks which will lead to faster project delivery.

Carbon reporting will be a vital part of a net zero future

Moving forward, the help of digital systems is vital if our industry wishes to continuously grow and evolve in a sustainable way. Carbon reporting is likely to become mandatory beyond public sector projects, and implementing a robust digital reporting system is the first step construction firms should take as the net zero deadline approaches.

While there are many businesses that have already embraced digital solutions and are reaping the many benefits, there is still a long way to go before we see widespread change across the industry, allowing carbon reporting to be easily implemented on top of a digital P2P process.

We look forward to seeing more construction firms embrace new technology, and in doing so, fostering an attitude of collaboration and a culture of transparency in respect to net zero – this approach is vital if we’re to hit our targets.

The post Reaching net zero targets with tech and carbon reporting appeared first on Planning, Building & Construction Today.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

RAAC: How big an issue is it?

Zoe Pond, Senior Associate, and Claire Burrows, Partner, at Brabners LLP on the long-term impact of the material.

CREDIT: Marco Bernardini-Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0,https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7915081

Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) has repeatedly hit the headlines in the last couple of weeks as the re-opening of at least 104 schools for the new academic year has been postponed by the Government following an inquiry that commenced in June to identify the use of RAAC across a range of public sector buildings.

Whilst the Government has come under criticism for the lateness of this decision (they’ve been aware of and monitoring public sector buildings containing RAAC, knowing it has a life span of roughly 30 years, since 1994), their assertion that “Nothing is more important than the health and safety of children and staff”, highlights the seriousness of the issue.

The Health and Executive (HSE) have placed a stark warning on their website: “RAAC is now life-expired. It is liable to collapse with little or no notice”. With the National Audit Office recently identifying more than 500 schools with buildings containing RAAC and the Department of Education reporting more than 50 schools at critical risk of sudden collapse, the full impact of remedial works to remove material, stabilise buildings or rebuild existing structures across the country is currently unknown but likely to be very significant. And the issues extend far more widely than just education settings. RAAC (a cheaper and weaker lightweight concrete material used in place of traditional concrete) was used extensively between the 1950s and 1990s in a range of public buildings including courts, hospitals and police stations.

Accordingly, the HSE have confirmed: “If you are responsible for the management, maintenance or alteration of central and local government buildings you should know whether your buildings contain RAAC, and act appropriately to ensure that such buildings are safe.”

Urgent action

By law, every owner/manager of public buildings is required to ensure the health, safety and welfare of their employees and the health and safety of those affected by their undertaking i.e.all visitors and contractors, including pupils. A failure to do so is a criminal offence that can lead to potentially unlimited fines and significant adverse PR.

Given the very real risk associated with RAAC that is now very well known, it is therefore critical that all those with responsibilities for public sector buildings take action now. Sufficient time and resource should be made available to properly determine whether RAAC is present in such buildings, its current age and condition, and any associated risks arising from the presence of RAAC (in this case, spontaneous collapse) that mandate its removal or the implementation of additional control measures to mitigate identified risks eventuating.

It is worth noting that the presence of RAAC may have a significant impact on the management of asbestos in certain buildings

As liability under health and safety legislation arises from the risk of harm, no actual harm needs to be caused for an offence to be committed meaning relevant duty holders of public sector buildings that fail to take steps to identify the presence of RAAC and conduct a thorough assessment of the potential risks to ensure such buildings are safe, are liable to face enforcement action, even if no incidents actually occur.

Asbestos and RAAC

It is worth noting that the presence of RAAC may have a significant impact on the management of asbestos in certain buildings. Before being banned, asbestos was used in various construction materials including insulation materials, pipework, guttering and boilers. For those responsible for the maintenance of non-domestic premises, including public buildings, relevant regulations include a ‘duty to manage’ any asbestos in them and to protect anyone using or working in the premises from the risks to health that exposure to asbestos causes (including mesothelioma – a type of cancer affecting the lining of the lungs).

It is well-established that if asbestos-containing materials in premises are in good condition and are unlikely to be damaged or disturbed, it is usually safer to manage them in situ as it is the smaller fibres generated when asbestos is damaged that present a risk of harm. As per the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, a survey should be conducted to identify the presence of asbestos, its type and condition is assessed and recorded in an asbestos register (made available to anyone likely to come into contact with it) and it is then monitored in accordance with an asbestos management plan. However, in circumstances where asbestos is likely to be disturbed or damaged or is otherwise unsafe to leave in situ, it is the duty holders’ responsibility to have it removed by a specialist contractor, which can incur high costs.

When conducting surveys to identify RAAC that is not immediately visible, it is important that any asbestos registers are consulted prior to the removal of any ceilings or finishes to ensure asbestos does not become damaged or disturbed in the process. Additionally, if the risk of spontaneous collapse arising from the presence of RAAC will have an impact on the integrity of asbestos contained in premises, asbestos may need to be removed before RAAC remediation can be undertaken to avoid further risks materialising and additional breaches of relevant legislation.

The post RAAC: How big an issue is it? appeared first on SHP – Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

SHP weekly top five

This week the articles most read have been: £3m fine for waste management company after two deaths, RAAC: A timeline of events, Company fined after worker suffers life-changing injuries in fall, Network Rail fined £6.7m following Stonehaven derailment and Printing company fined after worker’s hand crushed.

Mark Wheatley. Credit: Health and Safety Executive.

£3m fine for waste management company after two deaths

A waste management firm has been fined a total of £3 million following the deaths of two workers in separate incidents.

RAAC: A timeline of events

SHP provides a summary and timeline of the events with RAAC, tracking the development of one of the biggest public building safety stories in UK history, Dani Wozencroft reports.

Company fined after worker suffers life-changing injuries in fall

A Cumbrian construction company has been fined after a man was critically injured falling 10m through the roof of an industrial unit.

Network Rail fined £6.7m following Stonehaven derailment

Network Rail has been fined £6.7 million following fatal Stonehaven derailment that killed three people in 2020.

Printing company fined after worker’s hand crushed

A commercial printing company has been fined £100,000 after an employee’s hand was crushed by a laminating machine.

PLUS:

What exactly is risk management?
Latest prosecutions and in court
RAAC: Initial legal insight
PPE: Complete guide to Personal Protective Equipment
School trust fined after children injured by classroom ceiling collapse

Don’t miss:

The Safety & Health Podcast

The Safety & Health Podcast brings you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession. From working at height, lone working and other common workplace hazards, to safety culture and behaviours, occupational health and mental health & wellbeing, tune in for an easy way to remain up to date on the issues affecting your role.

SHP webinars

Check out the latest upcoming live webinar sessions. Our interactive health and safety webinars can be accessed live or on-demand, giving you the opportunity to learn about a range of key industry topics.

Get the SHP e-newsletter

Subscribe to the SHP newsletter for free, daily news and updates to keep you at the forefront of the profession.

Visit the SHP Taylor & Francis health & safety bookshop

SHP’s health & safety bookshop provides readers with an extensive range of Taylor & Francis published resources to help professionals create a safe and healthy work environment.

Taylor & Francis is offering SHP readers a 20% discount and Free Shipping on all titles.* Simply use code S048 at the checkout.

Have a read of the top 10 health and safety prosecutions of 2022 here

The post SHP weekly top five appeared first on SHP – Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Firms fined £120k after worker crushed by drainage pipes

Two firms, one of which is in administration, have been fined a combined £120,000 after a groundworker suffered severe injuries when heavy drainage pipes fell on top of him. Anthony Pennell, who worked for R O’Donnell Plant & Civil, sustained several fractures to both sides…

The post Firms fined £120k after worker crushed by drainage pipes appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

CIWM launches digital circular economy pack

MRW CIWM launches digital circular economy pack Specialists discuss ways to a ‘world beyond waste’ CIWM launches digital circular economy pack Mark Smulian Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

UKRI opens £1.5m contest for refillable liquid packaging

MRW UKRI opens £1.5m contest for refillable liquid packaging Entries sought for high volume goods sold at scale as part of smart sustainable plastic packaging challenge UKRI opens £1.5m contest for refillable liquid packaging Mark Smulian Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

CN100 2023: return to pre-pandemic performance for top firms

Turnover, pre-tax profit and margin have risen above pre-pandemic levels for the UK’s top contractors, the 2023 CN100 list reveals.  Aggregate revenue for the companies in the 2023 list approached £71bn, while average pre-tax profit rose by 25 per cent. Average profit margin outstripped its…

The post CN100 2023: return to pre-pandemic performance for top firms appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

CN Roundtable: Speaking the same language on data

A recent roundtable by Construction News and Hitachi Solutions gathered construction experts to discuss the challenges of data sharing. It uncovered a – perhaps surprising – appetite to put aside traditional rivalries to boost collective productivity. Ian Weinfass reports On the panel       …

The post CN Roundtable: Speaking the same language on data appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

New regulatory framework for higher-risk buildings: the key points

Brad Woodroffe is a senior associate at law firm CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang The wait is over for the new regulatory framework for the design and construction phase of higher-risk buildings (being non-excluded buildings of at least 18 metres or seven storeys and which…

The post New regulatory framework for higher-risk buildings: the key points appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Plans to relax pollution rules blocked in Lords

The House of Lords has voted down government plans to scrap requirements for housebuilders in certain areas to offset river pollution. In August, the government proposed an amendment to the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill that would have repealed EU-era ‘nutrient neutrality’ rules, which require…

The post Plans to relax pollution rules blocked in Lords appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Generated by Feedzy