Categories
Uncategorized

Why a site full of CAT scanners still strikes cables

Almost every crew working near buried services carries a detection kit, and that is a good start. It is not the finish. The crews that reliably avoid cables are the ones trained to use that kit in the right order, and on a live power cable the difference is the whole job.

 

Walk onto any utility or construction site in the country, and you will find a Cable Avoidance Tool in nearly every van. That is a good thing. The equipment is standard, widely owned and trusted, and it works. What it cannot do on its own is make the decisions: owning a locator and knowing how to get the most out of it are two stages of the same job, and underground strikes remain common precisely because the second stage is the one that gets skipped. The Health and Safety Executive records hundreds of strikes a year, and the real figure, counting unreported near misses, is higher. The good news is that this is a solvable, trainable problem.

It is worth being plain about the stakes, because they are what make the training worth it. Catch a live 11kV cable with a bucket or a hand tool and the result is an arc flash capable of causing serious burns or worse. Most strikes end in damage rather than injury, which is the trap: the near miss becomes routine, the risk fades into the background, and the one that does cause harm arrives without warning. A trained crew is what keeps that risk in view and keeps the tool earning its place.

That is exactly what proper EUSR Cat 1 training delivers, and it is the work Sygma Solutions has built its name on. The Wigan firm, the only independent specialist of its kind in the UK, has spent over twenty years turning capable kit into reliable results on site. Founder Peter Ashcroft puts the positive case simply. “The locator in the van is a good tool, and in trained hands it is a brilliant one,” he says. “What we do is give operatives the method to go with it, so a quiet reading gets confirmed rather than assumed. Train that habit in and strikes stop being a matter of luck.”

 

What a passive sweep misses

The weakness sits in how the kit is usually handled. A Cable Avoidance Tool in its passive modes only detects services that happen to be giving off a signal. Plenty give off nothing useful: an unenergised cable, a circuit switched off at the time, a balanced three-phase load that cancels its own field, a short metallic run with nothing re-radiating along it. Any of these can sit directly beneath a confident sweep and register as clear ground. For a safety-critical task, relying on what happens to be detectable in passing is a thin basis for putting a tool in the ground.

 

Genny and CAT, in that order

The fix Sygma trains is a change of habit rather than a change of kit. The signal generator, the Genny, applies a known signal to a target so it can be traced deliberately, turning a guess into a confirmed location. The method the firm teaches is Genny and CAT, in that order: connect the generator first, confirm the services you expect, and work outward from certainty rather than assumption. It is a small reordering of the routine with a large effect on what the survey actually finds. The shift is one Sygma’s clients report after training, with Genny use on live sites rising from below 30% to between 70 and 80%, against a target of better than 60% on every survey. Crews from Severn Trent Water and Wales & West Utilities are among those trained to it.

 

Competence, not just kit

None of this is optional in spirit. HSG47 and the CDM Regulations 2015 both place a duty on those planning and carrying out excavation to locate services before breaking ground, and locating them reliably is a trained skill, not a function of owning the hardware. For anyone responsible for safety on site, the question is not whether the crew has a CAT scanner. It is whether they have been trained to use it in a way that would catch the cable the passive sweep misses.

The strike that never happens leaves no mark, generates no report and earns no thanks, which is exactly why the training behind it is easy to overlook. On a live site, the difference between a clear reading and a confirmed one is the difference between a routine dig and a serious incident. The kit on its own cannot tell them apart. The person holding it, trained properly, can.

The post Why a site full of CAT scanners still strikes cables appeared first on HSE Network.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

A simplified approach to fire safety for lightweight façades

Lightweight modern façade systems are carefully designed to meet the performance needs of tall buildings, but people often misunderstand the complexity of passive fire protection requirements

While adequate fire safety systems must be specified as a life critical aspect of building design, the move towards façade-specific systems means that specification and installation should be straightforward. Paul Nash, fire stop manager at passive fire protection manufacturer FSi Promat, outlines a simplified approach to choosing the right system to provide passive fire protection in lightweight modern façades.

As with all aspects of a building, façades can see the rapid spread of fire around the building envelope if not adequately protected. This is why passive fire protection should be built into all lightweight façade systems as best practice.

While a strong focus is, rightly so, on the need to meet the non-combustibility requirements of high-risk buildings, wherever a façade is used, passive fire protection must be installed to limit the spread of fire. This remains an emotive subject and there is a very clear need to get this right first time, especially for projects that are classed as high risk.

The construction landscape has adapted and evolved in the wake of a stringent focus on building safety following the introduction of the Building Safety Act 2022. The recognition of the need for responsibility down the line, along with embedded traceability, has led to manufacturers stepping up to provide the solutions, data and training to make specification and installation as straightforward as possible.

This has included taking a holistic view of exactly what is needed to provide systems that address specific needs in the built environment. As a result, passive fire protection systems have evolved to provide easy fit solutions that are tested for use on specific façade systems to allow for easier specification and installation. These focus on three main applications.

Passive fire protection for rainscreen façades

Ventilated rainscreen façades feature an open cavity behind the cladding that allows air to circulate to help to manage moisture in the building. It is essential that this remains open to ensure ventilation.

Manufacturers have embraced the need for competency and collaboration to support the Building Safety Act, offering specification support and system training to ensure a full understanding of how the system needs to be specified and installed to work correctly.

However, in the event that a fire breaks out, this gap leaves space for heat and smoke to travel upwards if it is not protected in fire-resistant compartments. In a horizontal application, open state cavity barriers with an intumescent edge provide a solution that remains in its open state to allow air to continue to flow yet will expand to close the gap when exposed to heat. In a vertical application, the barrier should be closed state.

A dry fit solution, cavity barriers are easy to cut to size and are tested in line with industry guidance, with vertical, closed state barriers installed as a compression fit with appropriate support brackets. FSi Promat has created a range of cavity barriers that ensure a high level of protection where needed, with its Silverliner range providing fire protection from 30 minutes to 120 minutes (EI). Used to provide compartmentation, cavity barriers prevent the spread of fire from one floor to another.

Passive fire protection for curtain walling

Designed to support its own weight, the installation of curtain walling sees a gap left at the slab edge that allows for movement – and it is here that the fire risk exists. It is essential that this is sealed to prevent the spread of fire from one floor to another.

Slab edge fire stops have been developed to provide a tested solution to deliver the level of fire resistance required, providing between 60 minutes and 120 minutes depending on the product configuration or size. Systems such as FSi Promat’s Paraflam Ultra can provide fire resistance for up to 120 minutes, tested in line with EN 1364-4.

Passive fire protection for masonry

Passive fire protection must also be used in masonry façades despite the material being non-combustible as the cavity again provides a vulnerability that could see a fire spread.

Compartmentation must be maintained at compartment lines and around openings to resist the spread of fire in line with the requirements set out in the Building Regulations. Due to the make-up of masonry walls, closed state cavity barriers tested to EN 1366-4 (linear joint seals) should be installed to prevent the spread of fire within the cavity for a set period of time.

Clear data

With passive fire protection for façades broken down into distinct applications, systems are designed to work specifically with certain building fabrics to simplify specification.

In line with the need to demonstrate responsibility and competence, most passive fire protection manufacturers test their products extensively to show they meet the latest standard but also to demonstrate suitability in different applications, and when used against particular interfaces.

This gives specifiers and architects the information they need to demonstrate that a system will provide the required level of passive fire protection. The level of testing continues to evolve with manufacturers continually updating testing to widen the applications scope, including for interfaces as well as meeting incoming and updated test standards, such as the EN standard. Where test data does not exist for specialist or more complex applications, manufacturers such as FSi Promat provide expert technical support to find a compliant solution.

Training and information

Beyond this, manufacturers have embraced the need for competency and collaboration to support the Building Safety Act, offering specification support and system training to ensure a full understanding of how the system needs to be specified and installed to work correctly.

Specifiers can find support at every stage of the design, from early engagement and compliance data to expert advice for complex interfaces. Many manufacturers provide training in the specification and installation of systems, including CPD courses, in-depth training, toolbox talks and site visits to check compliant installation.

Through a belt and braces approach to responsibility and competence, manufacturers have simplified the process to specify and install passive fire protection in modern lightweight façades. This extends from comprehensive testing right through to specification support and system training to ensure the correct support is available to give architects and installers confidence in the accurate use of passive fire protection in modern lightweight façade systems.

*Please note, this is a commercial profile.

The post A simplified approach to fire safety for lightweight façades appeared first on Planning, Building & Construction Today.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

CIOB reveals winners of inaugural Hub Recognition Awards 2026

The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has revealed the winners of its inaugural Hub Recognition Awards, celebrating members worldwide who are making an outstanding contribution to the construction industry and their local communities

The new global awards recognise the achievements of CIOB members across two categories: Rising Star, which celebrates professionals in their first five years in the industry who are already making a positive impact, and Outstanding Contribution Award, which recognises members who have made a significant contribution to the industry.

The winners of the CIOB Hub Recognition Awards 2026 are:

Rising Star

Name
Hub

Tuberiu Nae
Bristol

Jack Spittal
Cornwall & Plymouth

Matt Jackson
Oxford

Suyash Pandit
Merseyside and Chesire

Tadiwanashe Taimu
Cape Town

Leon Brennan
Republic of Ireland

Mufaro Chuma
Birmingham

 

Outstanding Contribution Award

Name
Hub

Mark Swallow
South Yorkshire

Vance Babbage
Bristol

Paloma Hermoso
Exeter

Steve Goodhew
Cornwall and Plymouth

Katy Robinson
West Yorkshire

John Paddington
Wessex and Channel Islands

Joshua Waterman
London

Jennifer Makkreel
Oxford

Sandra Janik
Manchester

Jack Bennion
Merseyside and Cheshire

Daniel Kelly
Sydney

Ntando Sibanda
Melbourne

Nkanyiso Mbatha
Cape Town

Sarah Sharpe
Northern Ireland

Dermont Fitzgerald
Republic of Ireland

Hamza Momade
Toronto

Titius Akpan
Birmingham

Heather Fox
Cambridge

Leigh Jakeman
Northampton

Wyn Harries
Wales

Ho Chee Leong
Malaysia

Betty Lo Kar Yin
Hong Kong

 

We can inspire others to follow in their footsteps

Dr Victoria Hills, CIOB’s Chief Executive, said: “Congratulations to all our winners around the world. Being recognised by fellow professionals as a rising star or for an outstanding contribution to the industry is something very special, and it’s our privilege to shine a light on those who embody CIOB’s values.

“By celebrating the achievements of our members and showcasing them as examples of modern professionals, we can inspire others to follow in their footsteps. The construction industry needs talented people at every stage of their careers to help deliver the new homes, schools, hospitals and infrastructure our communities need.”

The awards reflect CIOB’s commitment to recognising excellence across the built environment and celebrating the people helping to shape its future.

They also provide an opportunity for local Hubs to showcase the achievements of their members and highlight the positive impact of construction professionals in their communities.

For more information about CIOB, visit www.ciob.org.

The post CIOB reveals winners of inaugural Hub Recognition Awards 2026 appeared first on Planning, Building & Construction Today.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Field management software for utilities contractors: Keeping standards steady across 30-40 live schemes

Being a rapidly growing utilities contractor taking on more live schemes adds its own stress. For any business to flourish, keeping standards high and keeping on top of field data and resources becomes a key priority – along with having evidence ready for clients, correct and complete

Heffernan Utilities reached that point as the business grew from a smaller contractor mostly working on utility infrastructure for residential developments into a UK-wide multi-utility business with, currently, 120 employees and 30-40 schemes live at any one time.

Manual processes can’t keep pace with growth

During their growth, Heffernan expanded their work across electricity, water, gas, EV charging, M&E, drainage and specialist enabling works. Before the business adopted Re-flow Field Management much of their operational information lived in paperwork, WhatsApp messages and other manual processes.

Site records were often kept in vans, which made them hard to find, and evidencing work got harder as the workforce and the number of live schemes grew.

Managing director Aaron Barkham describes the problem in practical terms: “As we grew in number of employees, it was difficult to maintain correct information, find the relevant information, and evidence our works.”

A form builder let the team shape their own processes

Heffernan originally went looking for better recordkeeping, communication, task management and compliance documentation. As the company kept expanding, the need became much bigger, and the team evaluated several options before choosing Re-flow as their operations software of choice – a platform suitable for multiple sectors across infrastructure, from highways and commercial landscaping to civils.

A key factor was the form builder, which lets the team capture field data and change processes without outside development. Danny Rouse, head of SHEQ, explains what that meant day to day: “We didn’t have to rely on Re-flow to build our forms. We could just recognise a need and build a form and have it ready on the day or the week depending on the urgency.”

Standardised workflows with clear steps for every scheme

Building scalable, standardised processes that are still flexible when evidence demands shift became a company priority. Heffernan now use their software to build their established procedures into structured workflows that take each team through the correct steps and make sure critical ones can’t be overlooked.

The vehicle check shows how this works. A driver can’t see the location of their next job in Re-flow until they’ve completed the vehicle walk around.

“They can’t even get the location where they’re going without doing a vehicle check,” Rouse says. “You don’t know where you’re going until you’ve done the walk around and you’ve confirmed your vehicle is safe to travel to work.”

If the check flags a fault, the transport management team is notified in real time. As the business has grown, Heffernan report less variation between departments, project managers and sites, with teams following the same process whatever the type of project. They also report that responsibility for safety has moved closer to operational teams. With the increased visibility and potential scrutiny of field work, site managers and operatives are more accountable and take greater ownership of safety performance on site, while the SHEQ team provides support, guidance and oversight where needed.

Risk assessments have become more efficient and streamlined, reducing a common point of friction and improving the quality of captured data. Paper-based assessments have been replaced with digital forms that capture site-specific risks and observations. Rather than working through a predefined checklist, operatives record the conditions in front of them with a form that either pre-completes repetitive tasks or hides unnecessary fields. This in turn improves consistency and produces a more accurate safety record.

The same records support oversight from a distance. With 30-40 live schemes across the country, compliance managers can review site records, permits, photographs and daily progress updates remotely, and check that permit conditions, signage, barriers and site controls are in place. That spares compliance managers from travelling thousands of miles to visit sites. Heffernan say the ability to show compliance consistently has improved confidence among clients, regulators and local authorities.

Audit evidence now takes about 30 minutes to pull together, not weeks

For Heffernan, records kept the same way on every scheme also make audit evidence easier to assemble. Rouse says putting a compliance pack together used to take “two, three weeks to gather everything together”. Now, he says, “within 30 minutes, I could be good to go”. This leaves the business ready for audits and accreditation reviews at any time.

Heffernan sees technology as central to their ambition as they develop into a Tier 1 contractor – as they keep growing while avoiding the pitfall of significantly increasing back-office resource.

“Without Re-flow, the business wouldn’t be able to achieve what it’s achieving,” Barkham says. “We wouldn’t be able to deliver the schemes that we’re securing.”

Read the full Heffernan Utilities case study for more insights into SHEQ, operations, commercial, HR and attendance management improvements.

*Please note, this is a commercial profile.

The post Field management software for utilities contractors: Keeping standards steady across 30-40 live schemes appeared first on Planning, Building & Construction Today.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Half of LPAs fail to discharge planning conditions in time, says HBF

Although permission may be granted, many developers still face delays as approvals are not being granted for conditions

Just 50.8% of planning condition applications have been determined within the statutory eight-week timeframe, and it is only getting worse says the Home Builders Federation (HBF).

Local planning authorities (LPAs) that fail to discharge planning conditions are often causing delays to housing delivery as a result.

Lack of monitoring makes issues harder to solve

The research, conducted by the HBF with Paragon Bank Development Finance, has also found that there is a consistent lack in monitoring planning performance, making bottlenecks and ability to hold LPAs to account much more difficult.

Planning conditions are the requirements set by LPAs to grant planning permission, and must be met by developers at different stages of development, as well as be approved via submitting information at stages before work can continue.

Since pre-commencement conditions must be cleared to start work on-site, developments often find themselves delayed despite planning permission being given already.

The statutory timeframe of eight weeks, or 56 days, has been failed to be adhered to by nearly half of LPAs. With approval times varying by a wide margin, meaning developers are met with even more uncertainty in their projects.

The HBF research found that, in a three-year period:

Only half of discharge condition applications (50.8%) were determined within the statutory eight-week timeframe
Performance appears to be worsening year on year, with the percentage of applications being determined on time falling from 55.6% in 2023/4 to 51.8% in 2024/5
The median determination time in 2025/26 was 70 days, 25% longer than the statutory target
There was significant variation between local authorities, with some local authorities performing strongly against statutory targets (with more than 75% of discharge applications determined on time), while others met the deadline in just 18% of cases

HBF research shows further planning struggles

Last month, the HBF published figures showing that the number of new homes receiving planning permission has fallen by 21% in the preceding quarter.

This means that just 45,315 new homes received planning permission in Q2 2026, the lowest quarterly total since 2012. Furthermore, in the year to Q2 2026, permission was granted for 214,515 homes, the lowest annual total since 2013.

The effect was sharpest in larger developments, with approvals for homes on sites with more than 10 units falling 21% from the previous quarter to 39,689 in April to June, 14% below Q2 2025.

In private homes, quarter-on-quarter there was a drop of 19% and a drop of 15% year-on-year.

Read more about the report here.

The post Half of LPAs fail to discharge planning conditions in time, says HBF appeared first on Planning, Building & Construction Today.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Revised review process introduced for pEPR fee methodology updates

MRW Revised review process introduced for pEPR fee methodology updates The introduction of a new method for the industry to provide feedback and evidence on pEPR fee system will look to better reflect potential concerns and issues in its management Revised review process introduced for pEPR fee methodology updates Neil Merrett Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Council settles £590,000 payment dispute with contractor

Southend-on-Sea City Council has moved to settle a late payment claim with a contractor after the firm launched an adjudication process against it. The council said it would pay almost £590,000 to Auburn Group over work done at the city’s Cliffs Pavilion performing arts centre,…

The post Council settles £590,000 payment dispute with contractor appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

BESA chief challenges construction to raise competence standards

The construction industry must match the Building Engineering Services Association’s (BESA’s) competence and compliance standards rather than expect it to lower them, its chief executive has said. Addressing BESA’s annual conference in London on 22 October, David Frise (pictured) expressed frustration that other parts of…

The post BESA chief challenges construction to raise competence standards appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Scaffolding firm fined £20,000 after worker killed by falling board

A scaffolding company has been fined £20,000 after an employee was fatally injured by a metal board that fell approximately 8 metres during dismantling work in Belfast. Samuel Magill, 60, was struck on the head at a construction site on Lisburn Road on 18 December…

The post Scaffolding firm fined £20,000 after worker killed by falling board appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Wills Bros lined up for £220m A9 dualling scheme

Wills Bros Civil Engineering has been selected ahead of two rival bidders to deliver a £220m A9 dualling scheme between Pitlochry and Killiecrankie in Scotland. The Scottish Government announced its intention to award the construction contract, subject to the completion of a mandatory standstill period.…

The post Wills Bros lined up for £220m A9 dualling scheme appeared first on Construction News.

Read More

Generated by Feedzy